TAKE A LOOK AT THESE COMPANIES CORPORATE ID EVOLUTION
Why do companies change their logos? why do they re-brand? here is a cohesive reason.
Follow the process till the end and it will become clear how design is
more of a
methodological process than just a personal decorating project.





| |
Notice the following corporations corporate ID current look and feel similarity. It is certainly NO sheer coincidence that most market leader's corporate ID appear similar.
Take
a look: |


| |
Market
leaders corporate ID involves methodological design approach their
logos are based on the famous credibility-based formula. We can all
agree that these corporations are capable of hiring top graphic
designers to produce ellaborate three dimentional with special
effects logos, yet they didn't.
The credibility-based formula, takes into account one entity only: the
customer and one objective only: immediate recognition and long term
memoribility:
|
| |
My
extensive corporate branding related research and practical endeavors
had proven that this formula is extremely powerful and rewarding. Here
are some of my most recent credibility-based corporate ID designs. |




| |
Notice the similarity in the design?
Although they're all different, yet are similar in the overall design methodology.
to confirm that these logos did indeed follow the same formula, take a look at the
following combination:
|



| |
A logo's main role is to nest indefinitely in the brain hypocampus (long term memory).
To achieve this goal, its design must take into account the credibility-based formula.
its design must comprise of two essential elements: the phsysical and the moral elements.
A cognitive task analysis study has shown that in order for the LTM to stock the logo
as
credible in the hypocampus, it must respect the neuronal methodology at all times.
It is vital to remember that the competition is fierce and visual pollution had become the
consumer's biggest pet peeves. One must take into account that too much information
kills the information.
If you'd like an in-depth analysis of this subject, I'd like to hear from you. |
.
|